![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Designplus Seminar – Protecting Design
Kingston University / Kingston / Thursday 12th May 2005 Brian Lucas, Dids MacDonald, Margaret Briffa & Paul Sheedy. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Legislation is a grey area for students and this conference set out to clarify copyright, and to emphasise the importance of the subject matter to its participants. Dids MacDonald from Anti Copying in Design (ACID) showed examples of designers who had to take big names to court (NEXT, M&S, etc.) Those who won their cases had good copyright advisors and knew the ropes. Dids used the term ‘Intellectual Property’ (IP) as a generic term for all patents, trade marks, copyright, etc. One of the most interesting pieces of information that she introduced was the ‘paper trail’. It would seem that in a lot of copyright disputes the people that could demonstrate where their original idea came from fared better. Margaret Briffa, a leading property lawyers (note property), specialises in cases of copyright. She showed some excellent images of a farmer’s design for British Leyland, which they used without permission. Because the farmer had kept the original design on paper, he was able to win his case against the big conglomerate. Yet again this demonstrates the reason why students should look after preliminary drawings. Margaret also introduced us to the case: Mrs. Morlet vs Mothercare. The former made a beautiful and practical baby cosy which the latter used without payment. No drawing – no win! Some important facts: Can you always know everything about patents, registered or unregistered designs and Trade Marks? NO – the law changes quite a lot and therefore it is important to seek advice about a serious NEW idea. Remember the ‘paper trail’ as Dids called it. Your preliminary work is key to safeguarding your ideas. |
|
|||
![]() |
||||
© Paul Glennon 2005 | ||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
top |